The Front Polisario Verdict and the Gap Between the EU’s Trade Treatment of Western Sahara and Its Treatment of the Occupied Palestinian Territories
Morocco’s control over Western Sahara and Israel’s control of the West Bank bear similar features in terms of public international law. Yet, when it comes to the application of its Common Commercial Policy, the EU has been treating the two cases differently. With respect to Israel, the EU determined that the 1995 EU-Israel Association Agreement is not applicable to the West Bank and Gaza Strip, thereby denying Israel any trade benefits with respect to the
Territories, whereas for many years it insisted that its 1996 Association Agreement with Morocco is applicable to occupied Western Sahara, thereby enabling Morocco and Moroccan corporations to enjoy trade benefits with respect to Western Sahara.
Full article
The-Front-Polisario-Verdict-and-the-Gap-Between-the-EUs-Trade-Treatment-of-Western-Sahara-and-Its-Treatment-of-the-Occupied-Palestinian-TerritoriesSupport our work
Support our work
Support our work with a one-off or monthly donation
AuthorGuy HarpazYear2018Pages23LanguageEnglish
Share via
Related resources
The Western Sahara Dispute: A Cautionary Tale for Peacebuilders
The UN and MINURSO have succeeded neither inconducting a referendum nor in…
Western Sahara as a Hybrid of a Parastate and a State-in-Exile: (Extra)territoriality and the Small Print of Sovereignty in a Context of Frozen Conflict
Within the liminal universe of parastates, what makes Western Sahara/SADR…
Conflict resolution in Western Sahara
The efforts to resolve the Western Sahara conflict have been jeopardised by the…