Protracted conflict and failure to achieve prenegotiation in Western Sahara Conflict
This article deals with a case of failed (pre)negotiation. The two parties to the protracted conflict in the Western Sahara have yet to succeed in getting to the table and engaging in genuine (pre)negotiations. Despite the existence of a UN peace plan agreed to by the two parties, both have failed to pursue direct negotiations in order to put a definitive end to this conflict, itself a result of an unfinished process of decolonization. The thesis in this article is that Morocco, for various reasons, has categorically refused to seriously negotiate with POLISARIO, which it does not recognize as an independent actor. The United Nations and Western powers, due to the absence of political will and/or questions of Realpolitik, also bear responsibility for the continuation of this enduring conflict.
Full article
Zoubir-PROTRACTEDCONFLICTFAILURE-1995Source: JSTOR
Support our work
Support our work
Support our work with a one-off or monthly donation
AuthorYahia H. ZoubirYear1995Pages45LanguageEnglish
Share via
Related resources
The Western Sahara Dispute: A Cautionary Tale for Peacebuilders
The UN and MINURSO have succeeded neither inconducting a referendum nor in…
Western Sahara as a Hybrid of a Parastate and a State-in-Exile: (Extra)territoriality and the Small Print of Sovereignty in a Context of Frozen Conflict
Within the liminal universe of parastates, what makes Western Sahara/SADR…
The Front Polisario Verdict and the Gap Between the EU’s Trade Treatment of Western Sahara and Its Treatment of the Occupied Palestinian Territories
Morocco’s control over Western Sahara and Israel’s control of the West Bank…